CO129-226 - Acting Governor Marsh - 1886 [4-5] — Page 292

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

283

which I will hereafter allude.

Other witnesses produced in support of the charge of theft. A yik, a trader, was examined as a witness against Cheang Ati. No a lik says that on the 12th March 1880 he had vegetables and shrimps on board a boat on which he was a passenger and that when they arrived at Pring Hoi, Cheang Ayu was robbed. That he and Cheung ate cause went into the hold and that when the goods had been removed they sailed back to their native place.

This is, I submit, a very meagre account of the occurrence; for instance, he says he knows defendant, but is not asked how or when. He does not say when he came or where, nor does he give any details of the attack on board the junk. He merely says: "We arrived near Sing Hoi. Defendant robbed us. I was in the hold in the middle of the junk. Cheng et yat and Cheung ate cause went into the hold. Cheng et yat, defendant, caused me to go into the hold in which I was. They removed the goods. For some time they did it. Removed it to his own junk."

The whole question turns upon the identity of Cheung et yat. When in cross-examination he is asked about his knowledge of the defendant and his whereabouts, he says: "On the night my goods were taken away. Defendant lives at Cha Kic. I knew defendant.

Edit History

2026-05-24 20:05:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
283 which I will hereafter allude. Other witnesses produced in support of the charge of theft. A yik, a trader, was examined as a witness against Cheang Ati. No a lik says that on the 12th March 1880 he had vegetables and shrimps on board a boat on which he was a passenger and that when they arrived at Pring Hoi, Cheang Ayu was robbed. That he and Cheung ate cause went into the hold and that when the goods had been removed they sailed back to their native place. This is, I submit, a very meagre account of the occurrence; for instance, he says he knows defendant, but is not asked how or when. He does not say when he came or where, nor does he give any details of the attack on board the junk. He merely says: "We arrived near Sing Hoi. Defendant robbed us. I was in the hold in the middle of the junk. Cheng et yat and Cheung ate cause went into the hold. Cheng et yat, defendant, caused me to go into the hold in which I was. They removed the goods. For some time they did it. Removed it to his own junk." The whole question turns upon the identity of Cheung et yat. When in cross-examination he is asked about his knowledge of the defendant and his whereabouts, he says: "On the night my goods were taken away. Defendant lives at Cha Kic. I knew defendant.
Baseline (Original)
5. 283 which I will hereafter allude. othe witivesses produced in support of the charge of to A yik, a trader, Su No a. On and Kwongtion or Cheong athiony who was tad mined as a witness against Chang ati. No a lik that the 12th says March 1880 he had conce vegetables bles and ehrimps on board a boat which he a passenger and that when they - arrived). car Pring Hoi, Cheang. Ayu was robbed their . That he and Cheung ate cause into the hold and that when the goods had been removed they sailed back to their native place. meagre This is, I submit, a very account of the occurrence; for - instance, he says he knows defendant, but is not asked how or when He He does not say when he came or where, nor does on board the juck he give any dok details of the attack. The r He. merely sap : "We arrived wear wear Sing Hoi. " Defendant robbed us. I was in the " hold in the middle of the juuck. "Cheng et yat and Chemiegati cause # " into the hold. Cheng et yat, defordons, " cauce into the hold in which I was "They fuuuu removed the goods. For 8 wen "did it. Removed it to his own. on junk"." The whole question terers -upon the identity of Chunget yet. When in cross examination he is asked about his knowledge of the, defendant aut and his "a On told me nauce, he says: defendantó do " night my goods маши " See the were taken away. "Defendant live Tcha Kic. I knew defendant
2026-05-24 20:05:37 · Baseline
View content

5.

283

which I will hereafter allude.

othe

witivesses produced in support of the charge of to A yik, a trader, Su

No

a. On and Kwongtion or Cheong athiony who was tad mined as a witness against Chang ati.

No a lik

that

the 12th

says

March 1880 he had conce

vegetables

bles and

ehrimps on board a boat which he

a

passenger and that when they -

arrived).

car Pring Hoi,

Cheang. Ayu

was

robbed their . That he and Cheung ate cause into the hold and that when the

goods had been removed they sailed back to their native place.

meagre

This is, I submit,

a

very

account of the occurrence; for

- instance, he says he knows defendant,

but is not asked how

or when

He

He does not say

when he came

or where, nor does

on board the juck

he give any dok

details of the attack. The r

He.

merely sap : "We arrived wear

wear Sing

Hoi.

" Defendant robbed us. I was in the " hold in the middle of the juuck.

"Cheng et yat and Chemiegati cause

#

"

into the hold. Cheng et yat, defordons,

" cauce into the hold in which I was

"They

fuuuu

removed the goods. For 8 wen "did it. Removed it to his own.

on junk"." The whole question terers

-upon the identity of Chunget yet.

When in cross examination he

is asked about his knowledge of the, defendant

aut and his

"a On told me

nauce, he says:

defendantó

do

" night my goods

маши

" See

the

were taken away.

"Defendant live Tcha Kic. I knew

defendant

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.